This is a post I wrote on the site, so please feel free to go there and read it if you have a question.

The “translation” of kinetic energy is the process of moving a body from one location to another in such a way that it has the same kinetic energy as it was at the point of departure. In essence, we’re looking at the energy that’s needed to move a block of material from one point to another. Because the body’s mass and volume are constant, we can solve for the energy needed to transport the block from one to another.

Since we know the energy needed to move something from one point to another, we can determine the energy needed to move something from one point to another using the translational kinetic energy equation. A good way to introduce this equation is to think of it as the force that pushes a body from one point to another.

This equation is a way to find the kinetic energy needed to transport a block from one point to another. It’s a little similar to the work of a spring, but instead of the spring’s restoring force, it’s the force that pushes the spring back. You can think of this equation as the spring’s restoring force pushing a block from one point to another.

The idea here is that if you have a block and a spring at rest, the spring will take up all of the available kinetic energy. If you have the block and the spring at rest, the spring will take up only half the available kinetic energy. The block will then have the same kinetic energy as the spring, and the process continues until each of the blocks has the same kinetic energy as the other.

Translation is a great way to think about kinetic energy. It’s easy to see how it’s related to mass. For instance, if you had a very heavy weight that was moving at 10 miles per hour, you could say that it was 10 times the mass of the spring, because that’s the same 10 miles per hour as the spring’s mass would be.

You can also be a physicist, but I didn’t think anyone was going to go the physicists route. I mean, it’s impossible to think about how much mass you’d need to have to have a spring at the end of a long period of time to make a reaction.

The idea of mass is not so much a concept of energy as of mass. It is more like the energy of a molecule. So I would say that our energy is as if it were a molecule. We would be able to move mass. The more mass we have, the stronger the more we would be able to move mass. This is why the rocket engine can do everything.

We’ve seen how mass moves, so we can see that we can use it to move energy? I would say that we can create energy out of mass. We can create energy, but we don’t know how to use it. That means we can only use mass to move mass. But if we can use mass to move energy, we will have access to the mass of particles. If we have access to particles, then we can use our mass to move energy.

The fact is mass can be used to move energy. But the energy of mass is not exactly what we want it to be. You want particle energy, not something else, so you can use mass to move it but you have to use something other than mass to do it.